Even Worse than Citizens United

In a May 28 editorial, the New York Times comments on a federal judge’s overreach:

The spree of big-money political campaigning — and the corruption that comes with it — seemed guaranteed to worsen Thursday when a federal judge in Virginia ruled that corporations are now free to make direct donations to federal candidates.

It’s hard to see how this decision can possibly stand. As the Times editorial observes,

The Supreme Court specifically said that the Citizens United ruling was about allowing corporate expenditures through independent campaign groups.

A separate Supreme Court decision from 2003, Federal Election Commission v. Beaumont, still stands and leaves no doubt that the ban on corporate donations to candidates remains the law.

The editorial concludes:

Campaign money bundlers will keep pushing the limits wherever and however they can — and the integrity of our electoral system will pay the price. The courts need to do a far better job of pushing back.


About Hamilton Richards

I retired in 2006 as a Senior Lecturer in Computer Sciences at The University of Texas at Austin. These days I volunteer technical support for Citizens' Climate Lobby (Austin chapter), Common Ground for Texans, (CG4Tx.org), Integrity Texas (IntegrityTexas.org), and several friends.
This entry was posted in Clean Elections, Money in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *